Originally posted by wsssaero
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SQ B747-400 withdrawal thread
Collapse
X
-
With SQ219 being downgaguged after Oct 4, and SQ227 upgauged on Sep 29, I would expect at least 3 Jumbos (maybe 4) to leave the fleet around that time period. After that, it's anybody's guess on when the withdrawal date is (Possibility that the rest of the 6 or 7 may leave at the same time by March 2010).
Comment
-
Originally posted by sumitsan View PostWith SQ219 being downgaguged after Oct 4, and SQ227 upgauged on Sep 29, I would expect at least 3 Jumbos (maybe 4) to leave the fleet around that time period.
Comment
-
Originally posted by zvezda View PostOne can hope. I would be hoping to not be on a JumboJet, preferring to be on either a WhaleJet or a 777-300ER.
Hope the murmurs of JFK being dropped aren't true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trawler View PostI am flying to FRA in late Dec then onward to JFK early Jan and am hoping that the 744 gets swapped out as I'm flying in Y.
Hope the murmurs of JFK being dropped aren't true.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SMK77 View PostDrop FRA-JFK and replace 747 with 77W - maybe they can alternate the second daily flight for ZRH and FRA and free one 77W that way...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by wsssaero View PostWith only 9V-SKJ left to be delivered this year for the MEL route and no more 77Ws, I suppose the Oct 09 pullout for the 744s is off?
The expectation was that the reconfigured 777-300s would free up some 777-300ERs to replace the remaining JumboJets. It looks like that's not happening. There should be some more A330-300s delivered in Q1 2010, so perhaps they will free up some reconfigured 777-300s to free up some 777-300ERs.
The FRA-JFK tag could be dropped, reducing the need for one aircraft. The HKG and NRT WhaleJet flights could be downgauged (to what?). Utilization now is low, so SIN-FRA could be started with the January delivery of 9V-SKK. To upgauge SIN-NRT-LAX would probably require pulling the WhaleJets from the existing NRT and HKG flights and adding one more. The problem is that loads and yields are so low now that SQ might not be able to get 5% more revenue (due to the better seats and IFE) to cover the WhaleJet's 5% higher trip costs on that route. Add in the acquisition/leasing costs and that's an economic loser. The route desperately needs the 777-300ER.
So, my best guess is: The JFK tag gets dropped, SIN-FRA gets upgauged to the WhaleJet in January, and SIN-NRT-LAX gets downgauged to the 777-300ER which will be freed up by 777-300s freed up by new deliveries of A330-300s (or the 777-300ERs get freed up directly by A330-300s) during Q1 2010.
I don't see any other plausible way to retire the remaining JumboJets by the end of March.
Comment
-
Originally posted by zvezda View PostSo, my best guess is: The JFK tag gets dropped, SIN-FRA gets upgauged to the WhaleJet in January, and SIN-NRT-LAX gets downgauged to the 777-300ER which will be freed up by 777-300s freed up by new deliveries of A330-300s (or the 777-300ERs get freed up directly by A330-300s) during Q1 2010.
I don't see any other plausible way to retire the remaining JumboJets by the end of March.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sumitsan View PostBetween Oct 2009 and March 2010, SQ will probably have 7-8 JumboJets. I guess each of the routes (SQ11/12 & SQ25/26) require 3 a/c, so 6 are needed, with maybe 1 or 2 spares. So depending on how many A333s are being delivered between now and March 2010, and the future of the FRA-JFK sector, I would go with Zvezda's guess on the way the Jumbos could be retired.
Day 1: Depart SIN at 23:50
Day 2: Arrive FRA at 06:30, depart at 08:30, arrive JFK at 10:45, depart JFK at 21:15.
Day 3: Arrive FRA at 11:15, depart at 12:35
Day 4: Arrive SIN at 06:35, depart at 09:40, arrive NRT at 17:35, depart at 18:45, arrive LAX at 13:00, depart LAX at 14:45.
Day 5: Arrive NRT at 18:10, depart NRT at 19:10
Day 6: Arrive SIN at 01:15.
So, five available aircraft are required. There is a 22 hour interval at SIN for MX and another 10 hour interval at JFK.
I don't see any reason why SQ would want to keep more than six JumboJets on hand to operate these two routes.
Comment
Comment