Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More SIA flights to meet Northern winter (2011-12) travel demand

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    IST has been Spacebed 772 for a few months already. You all don't reference my thread.....

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by 9V-JKL View Post
      IST has been Spacebed 772 for a few months already. You all don't reference my thread.....
      Ohh don't be sad. I'm sure I read it, but with progressing age my memory is not that flawless any more

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by jimyvr View Post
        Should be available as early this afternoon (Thursday 21JUL11). Routine schedule update usually occurs on Thursday.

        Probably few discrepancies like BOM gets 21 weekly and IST currently showing 7 weekly will be fixed too.
        post deleted
        Last edited by SQtraveller; 20 August 2017, 05:09 AM.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by MAN Flyer View Post
          Indeed. After SQ972 at 0940 there is no flight until SQ976 at 1600, so hopefully the new flight will be in the middle of that gap.

          Putting F back on the route would be even better, but I know that isn't going to happen.
          Singapore – Bangkok Increase from 4 to 5 Daily
          SQ970 SIN0730 – 0855BKK 772 D
          SQ972 SIN0940 – 1105BKK 772 D
          SQ974 SIN1310 – 1435BKK 772 D
          SQ976 SIN1600 – 1725BKK 772 D
          SQ978 SIN1840 – 2005BKK 772 D

          SQ973 BKK1000 – 1330SIN 772 D
          SQ975 BKK1230 – 1600SIN 772 D
          SQ977 BKK1540 – 1910SIN 772 D
          SQ979 BKK1830 – 2200SIN 772 D
          SQ981 BKK2105 – 0035+1SIN 772 D

          http://airlineroute.net/2011/07/26/sq-w11update3/

          Comment


          • #35
            Okay. A reasonable time slot for the new flights. Get's one into SIN still at a decent enough time if you got plans for the evening.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by feb01mel View Post
              Singapore – Bangkok Increase from 4 to 5 Daily
              SQ970 SIN0730 – 0855BKK 772 D
              SQ972 SIN0940 – 1105BKK 772 D
              SQ974 SIN1310 – 1435BKK 772 D
              SQ976 SIN1600 – 1725BKK 772 D
              SQ978 SIN1840 – 2005BKK 772 D

              SQ973 BKK1000 – 1330SIN 772 D
              SQ975 BKK1230 – 1600SIN 772 D
              SQ977 BKK1540 – 1910SIN 772 D
              SQ979 BKK1830 – 2200SIN 772 D
              SQ981 BKK2105 – 0035+1SIN 772 D

              http://airlineroute.net/2011/07/26/sq-w11update3/
              The new one is a head for head with TG ex SIN at noon and exBKK returning 4ish.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by SINFJ View Post
                The new one is a head for head with TG ex SIN at noon and exBKK returning 4ish.


                Im pleased SQ977 is back as it means I can connect to SQ227 to MEL again in a reasonable timeframe.
                My SQ and flying Videos: Youtube My Travel Blog: AussieFlyer.net

                Comment


                • #38
                  http://airlineroute.net/2011/07/28/sq-w11update4/

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Those 747s to Melbourne just won't go away.
                    My SQ and flying Videos: Youtube My Travel Blog: AussieFlyer.net

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by sqdazz View Post
                      Those 747s to Melbourne just won't go away.
                      Has anyone worked out yet what we did to offend the SQ executives enough to deserve this? It's getting pretty impossible not to feel singled out.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        They increase the flights to meet travel demands... but yesterday when they announced that their profit plunge sooo badly that they are very cautious about the demands..... Isn't it contradicting to each other?

                        Can the decrease of the profit because of the suck website?
                        visit my blog

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by SQ228 View Post
                          Has anyone worked out yet what we did to offend the SQ executives enough to deserve this? It's getting pretty impossible not to feel singled out.
                          Every mother's son is down in Victoria to work, play school. They need the capacity yet they cannot upgauge a A388 as the current fleet is in its own rotation.

                          .. sounds possible?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by lingua101 View Post
                            They increase the flights to meet travel demands... but yesterday when they announced that their profit plunge sooo badly that they are very cautious about the demands..... Isn't it contradicting to each other?

                            Can the decrease of the profit because of the suck website?
                            Don't believe what the airlines tell you 100%, especially with the press releases.
                            Airline Route | twitter

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by feb01mel View Post
                              SQ974 SIN1310 – 1435BKK 772 D

                              SQ977 BKK1540 – 1910SIN 772 D
                              Excellent. Makes using SQ between the two easier now.

                              Originally posted by SQ228 View Post
                              Has anyone worked out yet what we did to offend the SQ executives enough to deserve this? It's getting pretty impossible not to feel singled out.


                              I wish they'd send the 744 back to MAN!.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by SQ228 View Post
                                Has anyone worked out yet what we did to offend the SQ executives enough to deserve this? It's getting pretty impossible not to feel singled out.
                                I'd feel honored. F savers here we come !

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X