Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Singapore Airlines Flight Delays & Disruptions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SQ22
    replied
    Originally posted by CarbonMan View Post
    Incredible. Thank goodness they had a runway long enough.
    According to CNBC, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the airport operator, would like to attract more flights there. Perhaps Singapore Airlines could consider deploying its future A359ULH there rather than Newark Liberty.

    Leave a comment:


  • CarbonMan
    replied
    Originally posted by SQ22 View Post


    Photo of 9V-SKL on the ground at Newburgh Stewart Airport (SWF), taken by my friend who was travelling with his colleague. This aircraft will next fly into JFK for its return flight to FRA and SIN.

    CNBC reported this incident too, given it's unusual for an A380 to fly into this small airport.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/04/a-si...-blizzard.html
    Incredible. Thank goodness they had a runway long enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • SQ22
    replied
    SQ26 Diverted To Newburgh Stewart Airport



    Photo of 9V-SKL on the ground at Newburgh Stewart Airport (SWF), taken by my friend who was travelling with his colleague. This aircraft will next fly into JFK for its return flight to FRA and SIN.

    CNBC reported this incident too, given it's unusual for an A380 to fly into this small airport.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/04/a-si...-blizzard.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Desert Traveller
    replied
    SQ26 on 4 Jan from FRA to JFK got diverted to SWF.

    Leave a comment:


  • loldude333
    replied
    Originally posted by 9V-SPL View Post
    SQ25|02JAN (FRA-SIN) operated by 9V-SKM was delayed by over 7 hours.

    STA: 0650 (03JAN)
    ATA: 1412 (03JAN)
    A relative of mine was on that flight.......they were told that a hydraulic leak was detected while taxiing for takeoff.

    Leave a comment:


  • 9V-SPL
    replied
    SQ25|02JAN (FRA-SIN) operated by 9V-SKM was delayed by over 7 hours.

    STA: 0650 (03JAN)
    ATA: 1412 (03JAN)

    Leave a comment:


  • SQkid
    replied
    Originally posted by 9V-SKU View Post
    SQ638 has been delayed out of SIN 3 out of the past 5 days.

    - Dec. 22 STD 11:55pm vs. ATD 01:26am (9V-SWT)
    - Dec. 24 STD 11:55pm vs. ATD 12:57am (9V-SWT)
    - Dec. 25 STD 11:55pm vs. ATD 01:33am (9V-SWS)

    Any ideas what’s going on?
    I would like to know about this too... The problem I had when my flight got delayed on SQ638 last month was due to a late arrival flight with only 30mins between its arrival and expected departure however I don’t see such an issue of late arrival flights on these 3 days as they all arrived early.

    Leave a comment:


  • 9V-SPL
    replied
    SQ327|27DEC operated by 9V-SMM arriving into SIN this morning (28DEC17) apparently suffered a "hydraulic reservoir leak". Aircraft landed on RWY02C and vacated the runway, but had to be towed to gate E5.

    Leave a comment:


  • 9V-SKU
    replied
    SQ638 has been delayed out of SIN 3 out of the past 5 days.

    - Dec. 22 STD 11:55pm vs. ATD 01:26am (9V-SWT)
    - Dec. 24 STD 11:55pm vs. ATD 12:57am (9V-SWT)
    - Dec. 25 STD 11:55pm vs. ATD 01:33am (9V-SWS)

    Any ideas what’s going on?

    Leave a comment:


  • balajih67
    replied
    MI 921 from xiamen also diverted to JHB.

    Leave a comment:


  • 9V-SPL
    replied
    Due to inclement weather at Changi:

    SQ232|10DEC (9V-SKI) diverted to Batam.
    SQ449|10DEC (9V-SSE) diverted to Batam.

    Leave a comment:


  • 9V-SPL
    replied
    Originally posted by FN-GM View Post
    SQ51 MAN > SIN was cancelled today
    9V-SMQ was AOG in MAN due to a hydraulic leak.

    Currently en-route MAN-SIN as SQ9051 with an ETA of 1031 LT, arriving 06DEC17.

    Leave a comment:


  • FN-GM
    replied
    SQ51 MAN > SIN was cancelled today

    Leave a comment:


  • Thommo79
    replied
    Hello,
    Does anyone know why SQ236 was 5hrs late departing BNE yesterday? I believe it was operated by 9V-SVL?
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • SQfanatic
    replied
    Originally posted by Metropolitan Airlines View Post
    According to an aviation forum in Hong Kong, SQ 863 has been delayed due to some leaks of the aircraft. Aircraft involved seems to be 9V-SKK?

    As the result today's SQ 222 has been delayed by 4 hours to 20:10 AEDT and SQ 232 has been delayed by 7.5 hours to 19:35 AEDT.
    Does this explain SQ424 being operated by a 77WR instead of the A380 today (It'll be getting SWP off SQ631)?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X