Originally posted by 9V-JKL
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Changes to PPS?
Collapse
X
-
‘Lean into the sharp points’
-
-
-
If SQ had a sense of humour, like say VS, I'd say that this was all building up to being a bad April Fool's joke.
Unfortunately, in the same way they lack any loyalty to the customer, these guys really don't have much of a sense of humour, do they?
Comment
-
All this moaning and gloom and doom on this thread! Surely those who do fly SQ for business or those leisure flyers who get a rather large number of PPS sectors each year have nothing to worry about because you'll requalify under whatever new criteria is imposed.
Comment
-
I am betting that they will use "in order to serve our PPS Club members better".
Yeah, maybe in ten years time, they will make another 'enhancement' .
"To increase PPS exclusivity we have decided to limit the number of members in each continent to ten persons. This will help use to serve each member better. Thank you for your kind understanding."
Comment
-
Originally posted by jhm View PostAll this moaning and gloom and doom on this thread! Surely those who do fly SQ for business or those leisure flyers who get a rather large number of PPS sectors each year have nothing to worry about because you'll requalify under whatever new criteria is imposed.‘Lean into the sharp points’
Comment
-
jjpb3, you're right. I certainly didn't mean that people shouldn't express their displeasure, outrage etc at the rumoured changes. I share peoples' sense of unease at the thought of what's to come and what it may mean to their (and my) PPS qualification.
All I meant was that amongst all the moa^H^H^Hcomments on this thread, there msut be some (not me I hasten to add) for whom the changes are actually not a bad thing ?
Furthermore, although I might not personally like it at all, I can see the logic behind what SQ are doing. As I think it's been mentioned on here (or in the equivalent TOF thread), target your highest revenue customers (not those who rack up flying miles without paying very much); reduce the number of PPS members so that the service (hopefully) becomes better for the rest; and people will - so SQ believe - still fly SQ J/F for the inflight service rather than for any PPS benefits.
Comment
Comment