Originally posted by Greatfox
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		This debate goes to show the wildly differing expectations of what constitutes good service. While the 'seat upright during mealtimes' policy constitutes good service to some (including yours truly), it is evidently bad policy to others.
Personally I've found SQ's style of service to be rather adaptable. The crews are rather formal by default, but they are also more than happy to have a friendly chat if you are someone like me who prefers a more casual approach rather than old fashioned, more formal service. I'd describe it as intuitive. And besides QF, they're the only other airline whose FAs have been cool enough to call me 'Keith' instead of 'Mr Tan' or 'Sir' upon request! Definitely not 'Stepford Girlish.'
 [comment posted in the context of this thread]
							
						
  I've had "luv" on BA and "darling" on CX - both unprompted! 
							
						
, not a seat design issue. If you note the fares for a full econ seat (not Discount) You would be very upset when paying this on a long-haul flight to be woken for a meal service you do not require, especially when you have alerted the crew to your flight needs after take off. 
. Obesity is no excuse for denying me my fare paid seat and all that it entails, including seat movement. 
 and not a passenger one. There are presently a number of cases before the courts where the size of aircraft seating is being challenged due to the increase in size of the human population(AA/US) and airlines are knowingly way behind the times when it comes to human size demographics.
							
						
 .
							
						
Comment