The economic downturn has a major factor in this. I also think it needs more time to prove itself. Airbus have plenty of orders to be getting on with. As more aircraft get delivered the more popular i will get
i think it really depends on the decor that airlines put on the A380. For majority of Y pax, its nothing more than an ever crowded bus which is fine if you are afraid of being alone.
The only airline that has added comfort due to the A380 is probably Emirates with their fanciful showers, in seat bars and stand up bar area and maybe Qantas due to the sofa for Business pax.
People tend to complain about stuff like: Oh I hate the A320, or I hate the 777 or whatever without actually realising that configurations are entirely dependent on what the particular carrier puts in.
I'd rather fly a Fokker F27 with only 1 passenger seat (mine ), going longhaul with refuelling stops rather than an A380 flown by Air Austral.
People tend to complain about stuff like: Oh I hate the A320, or I hate the 777 or whatever without actually realising that configurations are entirely dependent on what the particular carrier puts in.
I'd rather fly a Fokker F27 with only 1 passenger seat (mine ), going longhaul with refuelling stops rather than an A380 flown by Air Austral.
I sugggest you better upgrade your F27 to ATR 42 so that when you fina
ly reach your destination and disembark you wont have a hunchback.(Can you stand up straight in a F27?)
Boeing believes in more point to point flights and hence will not build a new 744 successor
Err, they are building a the B748i which is a 744 successor.
In my opinion, the A380 is an a/c which can earn immense amount of money for airlines that have the traffic to sustain their operation. AFAIK, they are a cash cow, no pun intended, for SQ running almost full loads on almost all its destinations. It costs marginally more to operate an A380 over B744, but the returns are many times more, provided the load is good. That's the reason why EK is increasing their A380 orders.
I personally think that there will always be a slight demand for jumbo planes like Boeing 747-8s or A380s, as there are still some major airports that are strained in terms of slots.
London Heathrow - its third runway is just not going to happen anytime soon, and even with a third runway, slots will remain an issues. It is no surprise that LHR gets many A380s.
Tokyo Narita - another tricky airport when it comes to slots. Even Tokyo Haneda will face the same issues.
JFK - need I say more? JFK is so congested during the evening hours that A380s will be perfect for some of the routes like JFK to LHR (almost like an hourly departure.
A380s definitely has its role, and Boeing is right about airlines wanting to fly more point to point long haul route, but at the same time, there will always be airports like LHR, JFK, NRT, HKG, FRA, CDG, and HKG that are congested and airlines have issues getting slots. Like HKG to LHR, BA can easily consolidates three 747s into two A380s, and BA can use that extra slot on a regional route. JFK to LHR is another trunk route that can use A380s.
Beoing's 748i is only a derivative of the 744 with modifications to the wing design but still essentially a 744 still without any FBW.
Boeing at one time have envisage building a completely new double-decker replacement for its 744 but didnt bec it changes its mind and believe in more direct point-to-point flights.
MAS on 21 Jun has made an anoouncement that they are officially now looking into the possibility of cancelling their 6 A380s order due to "frequent delays" in getting the planes.
Comment