No More Y+ on SQ38
According to the SQ booking website, there will be no more Y+ after 30 August 2007 on SQ38 . As a result Y passengers to LAX will only have the choice of the daily SQ12 (SIN/NRT/LAX) on a 744 or SQ28 (SIN/TPE/LAX) 4 x per week on a 772. So it looks like I'll miss out on the Y+ experience and the new economy on the 773 .
Does anyone know if the reduction on the SQ28 is due to a lack of aircraft or passenger demand and if there are any plans to increase capacity on the LAX route to compensate for the loss of SQ38. I guess eventually we may see an A380 on the LAX run.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A345's to be refitted with 100 x new JCL seats only
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by maxmin View PostWhat do you think the chances are of this being complete by mid 2008?
Flip a coin methinks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iad777 View PostThis seems reasonable. I hope they keep the current A345 configuration until these aircraft are replaced.
Do you think the 772LR will open up any new ULH routes?
It is rather unlikely for SQ to buy 772LR due to its high price and low resale value of A345. Hence, chances of new ULH routes are rather slim at this moment until B787 and A350XWB arrive.
It makes sense to retrofit the A345 with all new business class seats to improve the yields and also to standard the ULH and LH products. Imagine flying spacebed on non-stop to LAX while the 1-stop flight has the new business class seat...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MAN Flyer View PostOr 'approximately' 100 seats anyway. Due to commence from year end presuming it gets final approval.
Also some interesting changes to the 'schedule' currently being considered. This could be a record breaking process indeed if it goes ahead....
What do you think the chances are of this being complete by mid 2008? Would you care to elaborate on the schedule changes?!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sqstalker View PostMy national carrier is generally more expensive than yours….so I choose SQ for flts up North. Reasons : Price and quality but not neccessarily just these 2 reasons
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by iad777 View PostThis seems reasonable. I hope they keep the current A345 configuration until these aircraft are replaced.
Do you think the 772LR will open up any new ULH routes?
It's very likely. As talked about in another thread, Toronto is being considered. Other cities like IAD have been mentioned.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MAN Flyer View PostWhich it hasn't done yet, and may now not get after all!.
There is a counter train of thought now that thinks some 772LR's would be a better idea, and to just leave the 345's as they are until they leave when these arrive.
There seems to have been a lot of chin and head scratching going on at SQ over routes (with IAH and the others they are looking at...) and fleet ops recently.
Do you think the 772LR will open up any new ULH routes?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MAN Flyer View Postpresuming it gets final approval.
There is a counter train of thought now that thinks some 772LR's would be a better idea, and to just leave the 345's as they are until they leave when these arrive.
There seems to have been a lot of chin and head scratching going on at SQ over routes (with IAH and the others they are looking at...) and fleet ops recently.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zvezda View PostRight. The seats from the 777-300ER won't fit.
However, in terms of the cushion width, the 380 seats are wider by 5 inches ( except for those seats on 11 A/K and 12 A/K which have the cushion width of 30 inches ).Last edited by UMD; 14 December 2007, 12:55 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by emperorsrisn't telling a member to 'deal with it' a little caustic on a personal level? or is this a classic case of cyber misunderstanding, seeing that your tone cannot be heard or felt?
Also with regards to your view on the B77W seats, I respectfully disagree. After flights from HKG to FRA via SIN, I found the B77W as comfortable as Economy Class can get (read: I found them comfortable). And while I find that my arse can suffer on a B744 Y in SQ, I didn't feel any problems at all after SQ326.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by emperorsrSQ IS our national airline. not supposed. not in inverted commas. and ask any Singaporean, our pride in our national airline IS strong, even as it is getting more elitist by the day. we may fly other airlines, but we still like knowing that they look to sq as an industry leader (and yes even if this means going up the premium scale). aint that an interesting relationship?
They have undoubtedly got greedy and arrogant over recent years, but I suppose with aircraft flying around that are full most of the time this is unfortunately somewhat inevitable.
We don't like it any more than you do, but the simple choice is to fly them or fly someone else. Those of you based in Singapore usually have the luxury of choosing another airline instead due to Changi's excellent network.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by emperorsr View PostYES YES YES!!! I don't understand all the people who glow about the new Y on the 77W and the A380. They may not have sat on the Premium Y seats. Maybe they are comparing to some older seats on TG or Ethiopian air. Maybe I am just spoilt by the A345. But seriously, the seat pitch is the same as the 747s, cushioning is thinner so logic will tell you that the metal innards of the chair can be felt if you sit there too long, and when you slide forward, you are bound to hit on the guy in front of you. If that seat is in your home in front of your computer, you would not sit on it for too long. Sat in that seat from SIN - CDG. Around 12 hours. I am 1.73m and even sat in the bulkhead row. OMG. Leg room or no, I should get SQ to pay for my massage therapy for the bad back and sore behind.
.
But for sure a 32 inch pitch is really uncomfortable for a long flight.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by emperorsr View PostSorry, but it is upsetting how greedy the airline is becoming.
Naturally, if i were SQ I would , cash in on my ‘best’ customers. Whine all you want but this is the hard facts of life. But you do have a choice.
Like I do here @ Down Under. My national carrier is generally more expensive than yours….so I choose SQ for flts up North. Reasons : Price and quality but not neccessarily just these 2 reasons
Finally, find me a carrier that gives you *comfortable Y seats from SIN to Paris. I’d like to try it outLast edited by Sqstalker; 11 December 2007, 04:00 PM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: