So this flight departs LAX at 1530 and arrives SIN (after a layover in NRT) at 0225 in the middle of the night. My question is, how does anyone at SQ think that this is an attractive timing?!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SQ 11 LAX-NRT-SIN
Collapse
X
-
there has been talk on this before not sure which forum
for LAX to NRT its actually good
for NRT to SIN it may be ok for S'poreans travelling to Japan and wanting to make the best out of their trip
for LAX to SIN ya it does look unattractive as by then most connections are out - perhaps SQ assumes people don't mind waiting till morning for transfers. I assume most transfer would be regional which have a lot of morning flights. I doubt many would transfer to Europe as that would be an extreme routing - perhaps this is their perspective?
-
There was a short period of time (about 1+ year, where SQ8 SIN-ICN-LAX and SQ7 LAX-ICN-SIN existed) where SQ11 departed LAX at 10am and arrive SIN at 9pm (it goes by SQ8->SQ11 and SQ12->SQ7)
Now with the introduction of ULR flights, SQ8/7 was scrapped, hence can't perform that SQ11 with morning departure. Can't really push back the current SQ11 departure timing to night time (with morning arrival at SIN) due to curfews at Narita airport...
Comment
-
Originally posted by SilverKrisSRG View Postcould have been better if SQ11 is to depart at 18.30 and to arrive early morning in SIN, but that is the busiest time of arrival from most Europe and few Aussie + Indian
I think a more possible solution is to bring forward SQ12 and SQ11 schedule by 3 hours (SQ12 departs SIN at 6.20am and arrive LAX at 10.10am, SQ11 departs LAX at 12.30pm and arrive SIN at 11.25pm).
Comment
-
Originally posted by alian View Postthere has been talk on this before not sure which forum
for LAX to NRT its actually good
for NRT to SIN it may be ok for S'poreans travelling to Japan and wanting to make the best out of their trip
for LAX to SIN ya it does look unattractive as by then most connections are out - perhaps SQ assumes people don't mind waiting till morning for transfers. I assume most transfer would be regional which have a lot of morning flights. I doubt many would transfer to Europe as that would be an extreme routing - perhaps this is their perspective?
On a side note, NRT's curfew hours will be extended from NW19 so a later NRT-SIN leg may be doable if SQ can get the takeoff slot.an infrastructure geek
Comment
-
Still need to give some buffer, otherwise a delay departure in SQ11 means the whole flight might have to be cancelled or re-scheduled.
Comment
-
That's why you don't change the LAX departure time too much, and give the plane a longer layover in NRT.
Currently SQ11 arrives at NRT around 7pm and leaves at 8pm. No problem now, but in winter they arrive at 8 and depart 9pm. A longer NRT layover would give everyone some more breathing space, to catch up lost time if SQ11 is delayed ex-LAX.an infrastructure geek
Comment
-
Originally posted by flyguy View PostBelieved a few years back SQ 11 from LAX via NRT arrives into SIN at 1am
In 12-2016 when it was changed from A380 to B77W the arrival time in SIN brought forward to 21:40. I don't know how long they operated this schedule.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SQ025 View PostSQ011 Arrival Time was also around 3am in 2012 op by A380 so it seems the timing was not highly unpopular.
In 12-2016 when it was changed from A380 to B77W the arrival time in SIN brought forward to 21:40. I don't know how long they operated this schedule.
With the introduction of the ULRs, the one-stop ICN routing was cut, returning operations to a stand alone SIN-NRT-LAX operation that brought as back to the previous A380 timings. The operating aircraft doesn't play a role, merely coincidental.
Comment
-
Originally posted by flyguy View PostBelieved a few years back SQ 11 from LAX via NRT arrives into SIN at 1am
From memory, I think SQ12 departed SIN around 8:30am-ish, and with the transit stop in NRT, SQ12 was scheduled to arrive into LAX around 11+-am-ish. The return SQ11 would depart LA around 1:30pm, with the final arrival into SIN just after 01:00am.
With the introduction of the A380, SQ revised the timings, including more ground time in NRT, that ended up with later arrival into LAX and subsequent mid afternoon departure ex-LAX.
Obviously SQ SIN-NRT-LAX flights have evolved, as @SQ228 mentioned which involves the introduction of the A380, and then the diamond routing insolving SQ8/SQ11 SIN-ICN-NRT-NRT-SIN and SQ12/SQ7 SIN-NRT-LAX-ICN-SIN, and finally the current situation where it is back to SQ12/11 on the 77W but it seemed SQ reverted to the timings when the A380 were plying the route.
Comment
-
Well the timings of SQ12/11 during the 744 era were the best.
In 2003 for example (have old timetable on hand ): SQ12 departs SIN at 0945 and arrives NRT at 1735, then departs NRT at 1845 and reaches LAX at 1250.
SQ11 timings were LAX-NRT 1450-1800, then NRT-SIN 1910-0110+1.
Amazing how short the turnaround time needed for a 744 was in NRT.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StarG View PostWell the timings of SQ12/11 during the 744 era were the best.
In 2003 for example (have old timetable on hand ): SQ12 departs SIN at 0945 and arrives NRT at 1735, then departs NRT at 1845 and reaches LAX at 1250.
SQ11 timings were LAX-NRT 1450-1800, then NRT-SIN 1910-0110+1.
Amazing how short the turnaround time needed for a 744 was in NRT.
And yes that was the timing I was referring to in my post. I too find it amazing that they could do with a 70 minute turnaround on a 744.
Comment
Comment