Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LAN clearing backlog of passengers to Australia, temporary re-route via PPT.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LAN clearing backlog of passengers to Australia, temporary re-route via PPT.

    http://www.lan.com/en_au/sitio_perso...-route-19junio

    On June 21st the flight switches back to the scheduled 6x weekly route of Santiago-Auckland-Sydney and on-ward connections to Asia via OneWorld (Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, Osaka, Seoul/Incheon, Shanghai, Bangkok, etc.) are being re-booked for passengers.

    The temporary route lifted off yesterday from Santiago, had a fuel stop in the middle of the Pacific in Papeete (French Polynesia) and now LAN's A343X is on it's way to Australia soon landing in Sydney (+2 in Australia/Asia now.)

    Qantas's flight from Sydney to Buenos Aires just lifted off.

    Due to the ash cloud of flying WAY NORTH over the SOUTH PACIFIC OCEAN and BURNING MORE FUEL the return flight from Buenos Aires to Sydney will be making a similar fuel stop in Papeete French Polynesia pacific island.

    Not a bad way to chill in a holiday island in the middle of the Pacific while your 744 or 343X re-fuels! ;-)

    And in other news SQ (Singapore Airlines) just boosted capacity from AKL (Auckland) to SIN (Singapore) to a 77W (777-300ER). Interesting, maybe this is a sign of on-ward connections to Singapore via Auckland and the Pacific crossing from Latin America!?

    Is LA/JJ going to be in OneWorld or Star Alliance?

    If it's Star Alliance the Auckland stop allows DIRECT ONE-STOP connections to Asia in Auckland (and NZ allows Latin America passengers in transit to STAY AIRSIDE with-in the transit area WITHOUT a VISA!).

    Interesting times for South Pacific oceanic crossings.

  • #2
    Originally posted by willzzz88 View Post
    Is LA/JJ going to be in OneWorld or Star Alliance?
    Huh?

    LAN Airlines is already in oneWorld and TAM is already in *A.

    Comment


    • #3
      LAN and TAM want to merge.

      Didn't you hear about this yet?

      IF the merger is approved the analysts are saying which alliance will be most beneficial to them.

      http://www.latamairlines.com

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by willzzz88 View Post
        And in other news SQ (Singapore Airlines) just boosted capacity from AKL (Auckland) to SIN (Singapore) to a 77W (777-300ER). Interesting, maybe this is a sign of on-ward connections to Singapore via Auckland and the Pacific crossing from Latin America!?
        Can't understand this, barely two weeks ago SQ282 (a red-eye) had approx 35-40% filled in J when I was on it. I think I saw the crew enjoying the boring late-nighter resting in the F section.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Kyo View Post
          Can't understand this, barely two weeks ago SQ282 (a red-eye) had approx 35-40% filled in J when I was on it. I think I saw the crew enjoying the boring late-nighter resting in the F section.
          One low loading flight does not mean much.
          My SQ and flying Videos: Youtube My Travel Blog: AussieFlyer.net

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by sqdazz View Post
            One low loading flight does not mean much.
            Certainly so, Friday night's SQ285 (03 June, which one would imagine would be popular due to the end of the work week) flight that I took into Auckland was 50% load factor. Not the most promising first-hand observations - but still, I don't deny the picture is incomplete. Perhaps wan1dap can shed more light on this as I'm well aware he flies this route constantly.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Kyo View Post
              Perhaps wan1dap can shed more light on this as I'm well aware he flies this route constantly.
              I'm not sure "constantly" is quite the right word (although my wife might disagree).... "regularly" is probably closer: roughly monthly return flights. Anyway, I can certainly say that since SQ285 switched to the 773, loads have been noticeably higher in J. Can't comment on Y since my employer's travel policy forbids me to travel there.

              SQ285 on Fri 17 June was operated by a 77W and I was op-upped to F because J was chocka, as we say down here. AFAIK it will revert to 77W full time from 1 Jul.

              Still nearly 3 months to the Rugby World Cup, but maybe people are beginning to head down for extended holidays - skiing + rugby?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by willzzz88 View Post
                Not a bad way to chill in a holiday island in the middle of the Pacific while your 744 or 343X re-fuels! ;-)
                Seriously? I would hardly call sitting in the holding gate of an airport relaxing... Especially when you're in Tahiti...

                Comment

                Working...
                X