Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does Silk Air operate as a separate entity?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why does Silk Air operate as a separate entity?

    Hello,

    This might seem like a stupid question to some of you, but as Silk Air is a full service airline, why isn't it integrated into SQ? Why is it run as a separate airline?

    Thanks

  • #2
    I don't know the answer specifically to this question, but generally - companies do this for a multitude of reasons - the list below is by no means exhaustive (just what I can think of at 7.30am )

    1) tax
    2) ownership laws
    3) employee contracts
    4) brand strategy
    5) risk mitigation (from a litigation standpoint)

    Comment


    • #3
      OP, while MI is indeed a "full service" when compared to TR, AK, et. al., are you saying that MI's and SQ's hard products and servicing offerings are equivalent, and come with the same capital and operating cost base?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by milehighj View Post
        OP, while MI is indeed a "full service" when compared to TR, AK, et. al., are you saying that MI's and SQ's hard products and servicing offerings are equivalent, and come with the same capital and operating cost base?
        That's the issue to answer your question, FN-GM
        Around SIN, there are many secondary cities like Makassar or Chiang Mai that cant command much of a premium.

        If SQ mainline were to serve them, they would have to cut back on the service, eg serve them with a A320 narrowbody, no Krug in J, a smaller meal in Y- that would dilute the very "premium" brand SQ commands. So their response 25 years ago was to create something of a "medium service" carrier that offers more than LCCs (esp on reliability) while being competitive for the markets they serve

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by concept|infinit View Post
          ...no Krug in J...
          There's Krug in J?!?
          HUGE AL

          Comment


          • #6
            maybe... just saying....

            deleted..... sorry...
            .
            .
            This is a computer generated message, no signature required....

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by kapitan View Post
              maybe... just saying....

              deleted..... sorry...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by SQflyergirl View Post
                I don't know the answer specifically to this question, but generally - companies do this for a multitude of reasons - the list below is by no means exhaustive (just what I can think of at 7.30am )

                1) tax
                2) ownership laws
                3) employee contracts
                4) brand strategy
                5) risk mitigation (from a litigation standpoint)
                6) To p*ss non-KF *A Golds off

                Comment


                • #9
                  Is Silkair's lower cost base also due to the fact that their crew do not layover at foreign stations? I think SQ wld put up their crew at hotels for stations of flights of more than 4hours. So for Male, SQ crew would layover for one night but MI crew will do a turnaround.

                  I've always wondered if MI crew also operate Darwin and Carins as turnaround flights. These flights are so long and there is no crew rest area in the narrowbody planes.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by gumption View Post
                    Is Silkair's lower cost base also due to the fact that their crew do not layover at foreign stations? I think SQ wld put up their crew at hotels for stations of flights of more than 4hours. So for Male, SQ crew would layover for one night but MI crew will do a turnaround.

                    I've always wondered if MI crew also operate Darwin and Carins as turnaround flights. These flights are so long and there is no crew rest area in the narrowbody planes.
                    Cairns is the only station where MI crew has a layover. As for their longest turnaround, I believe it is Kathmandu (almost 5hrs each way).
                    My past and future travels

                    My Travel Map

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by ycp81 View Post
                      Cairns is the only station where MI crew has a layover. As for their longest turnaround, I believe it is Kathmandu (almost 5hrs each way).
                      KTM is the longest turnaround, WUH is the second. I was on WUH-SIN a few months back and was chatting with one of the cabin crew about this. I'm not sure how they're managing KTM these days as the return flight makes a technical stop in CCU due to the fuel shortage in Nepal.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by 259850 View Post
                        KTM is the longest turnaround, WUH is the second. I was on WUH-SIN a few months back and was chatting with one of the cabin crew about this. I'm not sure how they're managing KTM these days as the return flight makes a technical stop in CCU due to the fuel shortage in Nepal.
                        Heard crew on the flight are laying over in CCU at the moment. Interesting layover destination!
                        My past and future travels

                        My Travel Map

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If I am not mistaken, SilkAir was started in the 1970s (ie before the current concept of budget airlines came about).

                          I think it arose out of Tradewinds (using chartered aircrafts from SQ) which provided affordable air and hotel package tours to the nearby countries around Singapore.

                          To keep costs affordable to the lower end of the casual traveller, it did not have on-board entertainment and F&B offerings were simpler. As Tradewinds proved to be quite popular, the airline was formed. I am not sure if it was wholly owned by SQ then but I think it was but to avoid diluting the image of SQ, it was kept as a separate entity.

                          It appeared to be an early "budget" airline concept but not as bare-bone as some of today's budget airlines.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X