Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

7 Days in Lisbon, 8 Hours in London: Qantas A380 Y, Heathrow Lounges, TAP to Lisbon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jumbojet Lover
    replied
    Originally posted by yflyer View Post
    As for 3 hour RJ flights, those can't be too comfortable either! That said, I haven't yet flown on Embraer RJ's so I would probably try to get myself on one of those just to check out the equipment, if the opportunity arises...
    Of all the regional jets I've taken, Embraer 170/190 are my favourites. Just need to try the CSeries for a fair comparison

    Leave a comment:


  • yflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by Jumbojet Lover View Post
    As someone based in North America traveling fairly frequently between both coasts, transcontinental narrowbody flights are an unfortunate reality, difficult to avoid. I've resigned myself to that misery (on US carriers in economy no less). That's nothing though, compared to being on a regional jet for more than 3 hours - imagine that!
    http://www.gcmap.com/featured/20180607
    Yes, agree it is seems to be mostly narrowbodies for US transcon flights. I have a 4 hour SFO-ORD sector coming up operated by a 737-900 and I am not looking forward to it! My return ORD-SFO is a 757, which I don't mind since there aren't that many opportunities for me to fly on 757's these days, since that type seems to have become quite rare in Asia.

    As for 3 hour RJ flights, those can't be too comfortable either! That said, I haven't yet flown on Embraer RJ's so I would probably try to get myself on one of those just to check out the equipment, if the opportunity arises...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jumbojet Lover
    replied
    Originally posted by yflyer View Post
    On a related topic, I am really not a fan of 4 or 5 hour flights on a narrowbody, whether an A320 or a 737. Even when the seats recline, these flights are just too long to feel comfortable in a narrow single-aisle tube...
    As someone based in North America traveling fairly frequently between both coasts, transcontinental narrowbody flights are an unfortunate reality, difficult to avoid. I've resigned myself to that misery (on US carriers in economy no less). That's nothing though, compared to being on a regional jet for more than 3 hours - imagine that!
    http://www.gcmap.com/featured/20180607

    Leave a comment:


  • yflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by Jumbojet Lover View Post
    Always enjoy your trip reports, yflyer! Just wanted to ask how you found TAP's non-reclining economy seats? These days I find that I almost always recline my seat as soon as I am able to even on the shortest flights. This is especially so when I want a good rest on board, so I can't imagine not being able to do so
    Thanks, Jumbojet Lover!

    Regarding the TAP slimline non-reclining seat, I found it fine for a short haul flight -- no worse than any other narrowbody. I probably wouldn't be too happy on flights longer than 2 hours in this type of seat, though.

    On a related topic, I am really not a fan of 4 or 5 hour flights on a narrowbody, whether an A320 or a 737. Even when the seats recline, these flights are just too long to feel comfortable in a narrow single-aisle tube...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jumbojet Lover
    replied
    Always enjoy your trip reports, yflyer! Just wanted to ask how you found TAP's non-reclining economy seats? These days I find that I almost always recline my seat as soon as I am able to even on the shortest flights. This is especially so when I want a good rest on board, so I can't imagine not being able to do so

    Leave a comment:


  • yflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by CarbonMan View Post
    Detailed TR with lovely photos, yflyer! Makes me want to go back for another few days.
    Thanks, CarbonMan! Lots of good airfare deals to Lisbon these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • CarbonMan
    replied
    Detailed TR with lovely photos, yflyer! Makes me want to go back for another few days.

    Leave a comment:


  • yflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by loldude333 View Post
    Another brilliant TR from your esteemed pen, yflyer.
    Thanks, loldude333!

    Originally posted by loldude333 View Post
    Lisbon is such a pretty place!
    It is, isn't it! A dream destination for photographers...

    Leave a comment:


  • loldude333
    replied
    Another brilliant TR from your esteemed pen, yflyer. Lisbon is such a pretty place!

    Leave a comment:


  • yflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by SQGamespeed View Post
    Wonderful TR, yflyer!

    Great pictures of Lisbon as well! Almost everything I hear about Lisbon, and Portugal in general for that matter, for visiting has been consistently positive, and I too would love to visit sometime.
    Thanks SQGamespeed! Yes, apart from Lisbon, my friends also recommended Porto and other cities/towns in this picturesque country with so much to offer to visitors. I can't wait for the opportunity to head back there...

    Leave a comment:


  • yflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by 9V-JKL View Post
    Thank you for sharing.
    Thanks, 9V-JKL!

    Originally posted by 9V-JKL View Post
    The food at IIIMPAR looks amazing!
    The reason I headed there a second time was to try their tenderloin steak with the egg on top, swimming in IIIMPAR's signature steak sauce! It looked so good on my colleagues' plate that I had to head back to try it!
    Last edited by yflyer; 23 April 2019, 11:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SQGamespeed
    replied
    Wonderful TR, yflyer!

    Great pictures of Lisbon as well! Almost everything I hear about Lisbon, and Portugal in general for that matter, for visiting has been consistently positive, and I too would love to visit sometime.

    Leave a comment:


  • 9V-JKL
    replied
    Thank you for sharing.

    The food at IIIMPAR looks amazing!

    I slept very soundly on this flight. I normally sleep fine in Y, but this flight was especially comfortable.

    Part of the reason might have been my choice of seat: My seat on this flight was 80C. This was an aisle seat just behind the row 79 emex row where row 80A had no seat in front of it.

    Which seat was better? 80A or 80C? At first glance 80A (Or 80K across the aisle) would be a top choice, and Qantas charges a fee to select that seat, however remember this: 80A had a fixed armrest, whereas the armrest between 80B-C was movable. That meant if no-one was in 80B, the lucky passenger in 80C could raise the armrest and have some additional space -- there was no obligation to share the empty space with 80A as the 80A-B armrest was a fixed solid armrest.

    On this flight, 80B was empty, and the lucky pax in 80C was me...
    The mark of a true professional traveller!

    Leave a comment:


  • yflyer
    replied
    Originally posted by balajih67 View Post
    That's a lot you typed in one day.
    Ya...spent the long weekend reliving my trip to Lisbon and London while writing it all up...

    Originally posted by balajih67 View Post
    Wish I could travel as much as you do...
    Be careful what you wish for!

    Leave a comment:


  • balajih67
    replied
    That's a lot you typed in one day. Wish I could travel as much as you do... Maybe in the future.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X